Pontiac Fiero Reverse Engineering ?

Started by F Body, May 20, 2010, 03:00:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

F Body

We've all seen the poor old Pontiac Fiero turned into all manner of fake Ferrari's and Porsche's etc

However see if you can spot the difference here









Any ideas ?????

F Body


FUBAR

It's the time that we kill that keeps us alive...

ianjpage

why ........ what ........ ok then...

philoldsmobile


Andy

I'm no Ferrari fan, but surely they have some of the best most refined sports engines in the world. What sorta Redneck thinks a poxy TWO POINT EIGHT V6 is an improvement?!

a91_formula

Quoting: Andy
poxy TWO POINT EIGHT V6


Watch it......................
1998 Fiero GT (my toy)
2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 (Hubbys new toy!)

http://www.solent-renegades.co.uk

Andy

Sorry,

In the right car, it makes sense. In a Ferrari..

Rob

There is only one good Ferrero........

Now that'll give you a proper bodykit......

HardRockCamaro

I suspect it had a blown drivetrain and was bought cheap when the cost of repairing/replacing it by a Ferrari specialist was brought up...
I'm pretty sure that back in the 80s finding someone to work on Italian exotics was pretty difficult and costly.
I know it puts a lot of people off Range Rovers and Jaguars in the USA for the same reason.

FUBAR

Quoting: HardRockCamaro
I suspect it had a blown drivetrain and was bought cheap when the cost of repairing/replacing it by a Ferrari specialist was brought up...


I would imagine thats pretty spot on TBH
It's the time that we kill that keeps us alive...

philoldsmobile

I'd also guess that is the case. in the early 80's a lot of ferrari dealers pulled out of the US due to the 308 GT4 (not to be confused with the car here) being the only car they sold stateside, as it wasn't great, and back in the day rather ugly.

it took quite a while for the dealer network and specialists to re establish themselves, the 308 really kick started things in the US and was hugely popular, but specialists took a while to re establish, meaning there was a long period where it was very difficult to get a ferrari worked on anywhere other than the main dealers.

now, good used 308 engines are easy and relatively cheap to find (plentiful supply as rust and accident damage killed 308's faster than the engine - its a very strong unit), but if it was blown up 10 years ago, it would have been a very different situation

there is an article on the 308 in Auto Italia this month, and they state the 308 GT4 dino as almost causing the collapse of ferrari in the US. I wonder if we'd have ferrari at all if that had happened, as in the late 80's and early 90's the US market kept Ferrari in business, no question.

philoldsmobile

Quoting: Andy
I'm no Ferrari fan, but surely they have some of the best most refined sports engines in the world. What sorta Redneck thinks a poxy TWO POINT EIGHT V6 is an improvement?!


you think they would have at least done something to compensate for the fact its 100bhp down on the original V8......

Shifty

Quoting: HardRockCamaro
I suspect it had a blown drivetrain and was bought cheap when the cost of repairing/replacing it by a Ferrari specialist was brought up...
I'm pretty sure that back in the 80s finding someone to work on Italian exotics was pretty difficult and costly.
I know it puts a lot of people off Range Rovers and Jaguars in the USA fo


Quoting: philoldsmobile
I'd also guess that is the case. in the early 80's a lot of ferrari dealers pulled out of the US due to the 308 GT4 (not to be confused with the car here) being the only car they sold stateside, as it wasn't great, and back in the day rather ugly.

it took quite a while for the dealer network and specialists to re establish themselves, the 308 really kick started things in the US and was hugely popular, but specialists took a while to re establish, meaning there was a long period where it was very difficult to get a ferrari worked on anywhere other than the main dealers.

now, good used 308 engines are easy and relatively cheap to find (plentiful supply as rust and accident damage killed 308's faster than the engine - its a very strong unit), but if it was blown up 10 years ago, it would have been a very different situation

there is an article on the 308 in Auto Italia this month, and they state the 308 GT4 dino as almost causing the collapse of ferrari in the US. I wonder if we'd have ferrari at all if that had happened, as in the late 80's and early 90's the US market kept Ferrari in business, no question.


I to agree with the above but why put such a woefully s**t engine in it, there are so many alternatives that would have been a better choice.

Guess it was the only thing they had to hand at the time.

Roadkill

Quoting: Shifty
there are so many alternatives that would have been a better choice.


Like the Northstar . . . .

FUBAR

Quoting: Roadkill
Like the Fist of the Northstar . . . .




It's the time that we kill that keeps us alive...

philoldsmobile

Quoting: Roadkill
Like the Northstar . .



ideal, or an oldsmobile araura engine. either would be visually similar to the Ferrari lump, too.

HardRockCamaro

Again, depends when it was done.
The Northstar came out in 93 and while a lightweight engine it is very expensive to buy as a crate engine (about $8,500 list for a regular Northstar and about $14,500 for the supercharged version) and was only available as a crate engine from about 2004 I think.
Even second hand they are pretty pricey due to head gasket problems and the high cost of buying a replacement from GM should you be unlucky enough to have said hg problem.
But yes, a Northstar would be a great engine to put in there.